Reyes v. Watson

249 S.W.3d 240, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 441, 2008 WL 850204
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 1, 2008
DocketED 90128
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 S.W.3d 240 (Reyes v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reyes v. Watson, 249 S.W.3d 240, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 441, 2008 WL 850204 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Clinton L. Watson, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County sustaining and thereby granting full force and effect to the plaintiffs’ foreign judgment against the defendants, dismissing the defendants’ pending motions for lack of prosecution, and ordering execution to proceed on certain real property owned by Mr. Watson’s co-defendant. 1 Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5). 2

1

. Mr. Watson appears to argue on behalf of all of the defendants. However, Mr. Watson’s co-defendants are not parties to this appeal.

2

. The plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the appeal based on Mr. Watson’s alleged lack of standing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 S.W.3d 240, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 441, 2008 WL 850204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyes-v-watson-moctapp-2008.