Rhoden v. Rinker Materials of Florida, Inc.

955 So. 2d 1251, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7494, 2007 WL 1434975
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 17, 2007
DocketNo. 1D06-4220
StatusPublished

This text of 955 So. 2d 1251 (Rhoden v. Rinker Materials of Florida, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rhoden v. Rinker Materials of Florida, Inc., 955 So. 2d 1251, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7494, 2007 WL 1434975 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of certiorari. The order at issue was filed on July 12, 2006. The petition for writ of certiorari was filed on August 16, 2006. Accordingly, the petition was not timely filed. Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(b). Additionally, even if the order was timely filed, the petition [1252]*1252would be denied because there is an adequate remedy on appeal. See Dunmore v. Eagle Motor Lines, 560 So.2d 1261 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

DENIED.

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunmore v. Eagle Motor Lines
560 So. 2d 1261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
955 So. 2d 1251, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7494, 2007 WL 1434975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhoden-v-rinker-materials-of-florida-inc-fladistctapp-2007.