Rheem v. Naugatuck Wheel Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rheem v. Naugatuck Wheel Co.

33 Pa. 356

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 1, 1859

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 33 Pa. 356 (Rheem v. Naugatuck Wheel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rheem v. Naugatuck Wheel Co., 33 Pa. 356 (Pa. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Read, J.

Eor the reasons so well assigned by the president judge, the court below were right in refusing to set aside the fi.fa. in this case, upon the ground of a writ of error pending in this court; which did not operate as a supersedeas, because there was but one surety in the recognisance of hail in error. There was nothing in the circumstances of the case to take it out of the general rule.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Read, J.

Eor the reasons so well assigned by the president judge, the court below were right in refusing to set aside the fi.fa. in this case, upon the ground of a writ of error pending in this court; which did not operate as a supersedeas, because there was but one surety in the recognisance of hail in error. There was nothing in the circumstances of the case to take it out of the general rule.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Pa. 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rheem-v-naugatuck-wheel-co-pa-1859.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack