R.F. v. M.M.
This text of 2010 ND 195 (R.F. v. M.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 10/19/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2010 ND 192
In the Interest of D.V.A.
Cynthia M. Feland, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20100091
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Cynthia Mae Feland (appeared), Assistant State’s Attorney, and Jordan J. Evert (argued), third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4413, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for respondent and appellant.
Interest of D.V.A.
[¶1] D.V.A. appeals from a district court order continuing his commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. See In the Matter of D.V.A. , 2009 ND 75, 764 N.W.2d 417; In the Interest of D.V.A. , 2004 ND 57, 676 N.W.2d 776. He argues the district court’s order violated his right to the least restrictive available treatment program or facility under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-13 and the court erred when it failed to consider any least restrictive treatment programs for him. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7) and In the Interest of P.F. , 2008 ND 37, 744 N.W.2d 724.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2010 ND 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rf-v-mm-nd-2010.