Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6046

DAVID L. REYNOLDS,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-01079-JCC-TRJ)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 29, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David L. Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David L. Reynolds appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1651 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia, No.

1:09-cv-01079-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2009). Additionally,

we deny as unnecessary Reynolds’ motion for a certificate of

appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED