Reynolds v. Strickland
363 F. App'x 394
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reynolds v. Strickland. Read the opinion of the Court — 583 F.3d 956 →
Opinion
ORDER
The motion by the appellant, Mark Brown, for a stay of execution is denied, and the panel affirms the district court for the reasons set forth in the district court opinion, Reynolds (Brown) v. Strickland, No. 2:10-cv-27 (S.D.Ohio Feb. 2, 2010), and in our recent opinion in Cooey (Biros) v. Strickland, 589 F.3d 210 (6th Cir.2009).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reynolds v. Strickland, 363 F. App'x 394 (6th Cir. 2010).
363 F. App'x 394 (Reynolds v. Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cooey v. Strickland
589 F.3d 210 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)