Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Reynolds v. State

Reynolds v. State

96 S.E. 499, 22 Ga. App. 552, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 598
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 30, 1918
Docket9695
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 S.E. 499 (Reynolds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reynolds v. State, 96 S.E. 499, 22 Ga. App. 552, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 598 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bboyi.es, P. J.

In this ease the evidence relied Upon by the State to convict the defendants was wholly circumstantial,'and was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. The court therefore erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur. Brinson & Ilaicher, for plaintiff in error. A. L. FranJclin, solicitor-general, John M. Graham, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. State
113 S.E. 93 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 S.E. 499, 22 Ga. App. 552, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-state-gactapp-1918.