Taylor v. State

113 S.E. 98, 29 Ga. App. 57, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 55

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1922·No. 13738·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence was insufficient to authorize the conviction. For this reason it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodioorth, J., eoneur. E. E. Cox, for plaintiff in error. Charles Watt, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 113 S.E. 98, 29 Ga. App. 57, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

113 S.E. 98 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.