Reynolds v. Lovett, Secretary of National Defense

D.C. Circuit

Reynolds v. Lovett, Secretary of National Defense

201 F.2d 181

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 6, 1953

Docket10912

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 201 F.2d 181 (Reynolds v. Lovett, Secretary of National Defense) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reynolds v. Lovett, Secretary of National Defense, 201 F.2d 181 (D.C. Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinions

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns the rights of civilian Government employees having veterans’ preferences. Appellants were honorably discharged soldiers, employed at the Mare Island Naval Shipyard, and their records were rated good or better. A reduction in the number of employees at the Shipyard was made. Appellants were reduced in their positions and grades, while non-veterans in the same classifications were retained in their positions and grades. Appellee officials say that appellants were demoted because, in the judgment of the officers in charge of the Shipyard, they were not qualified for the supervisory nucleus, composed of the best craftsmen, each one carefully selected on the basis of his individual qualifications. They say that the non-veterans were deemed by them better qualified for supervisory positions than were the appellants. We think that appellees’ view that when personnel is reduced the head of an agency may select employees to be retained in any classification on the basis of individual merit and without giving effect to Section 12 of the Veterans’ Preference Act¹ is erroneous.

The case is reversed and remanded for action in accordance with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns the rights of civilian Government employees having veterans’ preferences. Appellants were honorably discharged soldiers, employed at the Mare Island Naval Shipyard, and their records were rated good or better. A reduction in the number of employees at the Shipyard was made. Appellants were reduced in their positions and grades, while non-veterans in the same classifications were retained in their positions and grades. Appellee officials say that appellants were demoted because, in the judgment of the officers in charge of the Shipyard, they were not qualified for the supervisory nucleus, composed of the best craftsmen, each one carefully selected on the basis of his individual qualifications. They say that the non-veterans were deemed by them better qualified for supervisory positions than were the appellants. We think that appellees’ view that when personnel is reduced the head of an agency may select employees to be retained in any classification on the basis of individual merit and without giving effect to Section 12 of the Veterans’ Preference Act¹ is erroneous.

The case is reversed and remanded for action in accordance with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 F.2d 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-lovett-secretary-of-national-defense-cadc-1953.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack