Reynolds v. Curtiss

55 N.W. 543, 53 Minn. 257, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 316
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 11, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gilfillan, C. J.

The court below having found against the .allegation that there was an agreement extending the time for redemption, there is no basis for any of the questions of law raised; .and the evidence was such as to justify the' court’s finding of fact.

Order affirmed.

Vanderburgh, J., took no part in this decision,

(Opinion published 55 N. W. Rep. 543.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds v. Curtiss, 55 N.W. 543, 53 Minn. 257, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 316 (Mich. 1893).

55 N.W. 543 (Reynolds v. Curtiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wentworth v. Tubbs
55 N.W. 543 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1893)