Reyes v. Stauber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reyes v. Stauber

287 A.D.2d 609, 731 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9873

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 22, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), entered December 26, 2000, which granted the plaintiffs motion to quash a subpoena served on her attorney.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion to quash a subpoena served on her attorney (see, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Abrams, 71 NY2d 327; Golden Mark Maintenance v Alarcon, 265 AD2d 377; Matter of County of Nassau Police Dept. v Judge, 237 AD2d 354). S. Miller, J. P., McGinity, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), entered December 26, 2000, which granted the plaintiffs motion to quash a subpoena served on her attorney.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion to quash a subpoena served on her attorney (see, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Abrams, 71 NY2d 327; Golden Mark Maintenance v Alarcon, 265 AD2d 377; Matter of County of Nassau Police Dept. v Judge, 237 AD2d 354). S. Miller, J. P., McGinity, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Reyes v. Stauber, 287 A.D.2d 609, 731 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

287 A.D.2d 609 (Reyes v. Stauber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related