Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Reyes v. Stauber

Reyes v. Stauber

287 A.D.2d 609, 731 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9873
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 22, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 287 A.D.2d 609 (Reyes v. Stauber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reyes v. Stauber, 287 A.D.2d 609, 731 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), entered December 26, 2000, which granted the plaintiffs motion to quash a subpoena served on her attorney.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion to quash a subpoena served on her attorney (see, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Abrams, 71 NY2d 327; Golden Mark Maintenance v Alarcon, 265 AD2d 377; Matter of County of Nassau Police Dept. v Judge, 237 AD2d 354). S. Miller, J. P., McGinity, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Abrams
520 N.E.2d 535 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
County of Nassau Police Department v. Judge
237 A.D.2d 354 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Golden Mark Maintenance, Ltd. v. Alarcon
265 A.D.2d 377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
287 A.D.2d 609, 731 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyes-v-stauber-nyappdiv-2001.