Golden Mark Maintenance, Ltd. v. Alarcon

265 A.D.2d 377, 696 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10239
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 12, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 265 A.D.2d 377 (Golden Mark Maintenance, Ltd. v. Alarcon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golden Mark Maintenance, Ltd. v. Alarcon, 265 A.D.2d 377, 696 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10239 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for tortious interference with business relations and defamation, the plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated July 28, 1998, which granted the motion of nonparty witnesses Gus Bevona, Kevin McCulloch, and Ira Sturm to quash subpoenas served on them by the plaintiff, and (2), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the same court, entered October 20, 1998, as, upon granting its motion to reargue, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 28, 1998, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered October 20, 1998, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered October 20, 1998, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the nonparty respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly quashed the subpoenas at issue because the information they sought was irrelevant. In any event, the plaintiff failed to establish that the information sought to be discovered could not be obtained from other sources (see, Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044; Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Abrams, 71 NY2d 327, 331-332; Myrie v Shelley, 237 AD2d 337, 338; Matter of Validation Review Assocs., 237 AD2d 614, 615). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mendelovitz v. Cohen
49 A.D.3d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Hamilton v. Touseull
48 A.D.3d 520 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Moran v. McCarthy, Safrath & Carbone, P.C.
31 A.D.3d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Degliuomini v. Degliuomini
308 A.D.2d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Reyes v. Stauber
287 A.D.2d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D.2d 377, 696 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-mark-maintenance-ltd-v-alarcon-nyappdiv-1999.