Reyes v. State

858 So. 2d 405, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17615, 2003 WL 22715974
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reyes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 854 So. 2d 816
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 2003·No. No. 3D03-1048·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

The defendant challenges the three-year mandatory minimum sentence imposed as illegal. The three-year mandatory minimum sentence was added to the Criminal Code by Section 9 of Chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida. The defendant asserts that Chapter 99-188 violates the single subject rule and is unconstitutional. This Court has previously held that Chapter 99-188 does not violate the single subject requirement of the Florida Constitution. State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112, 1113-14 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (en banc). As we did in that case, we certify direct conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).

Affirmed; direct conflict certified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reyes v. State, 858 So. 2d 405, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17615, 2003 WL 22715974 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

858 So. 2d 405 (Reyes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Franklin
836 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)