Reyes v. State
857 So. 2d 976, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16143, 2003 WL 22439549
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reyes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 854 So. 2d 816 →
Opinion
Because cases like Rahmings v. State, 660 So.2d 1390 (Fla.1995)(failure to appear for sentencing, standing alone, was invalid reason for upward departure sentence) and Bolden v. State, 691 So.2d 23 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)(defendant cannot by agreement confer on court authority to impose illegal departure sentence), which involve guideline sentences, do not apply to post-October 1, 1998 offenses like this one, which are governed by the Criminal Punishment Code, the order below denying post-conviction relief is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reyes v. State, 857 So. 2d 976, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16143, 2003 WL 22439549 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
857 So. 2d 976 (Reyes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rahmings v. State
660 So. 2d 1390 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Bolden v. State
691 So. 2d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)