Reyes v. Lexington 79th Corp.

2017 NY Slip Op 2894, 149 A.D.3d 508, 51 N.Y.S.3d 500
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 13, 2017
Docket3708N 301441/14
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2894 (Reyes v. Lexington 79th Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reyes v. Lexington 79th Corp., 2017 NY Slip Op 2894, 149 A.D.3d 508, 51 N.Y.S.3d 500 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered June 10, 2015, which to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied defendants’ motion to compel discovery of plaintiff’s medical, psychological, psychiatric, and academic records, and income tax returns, unanimously modi *509 fied, on the law, to grant the motion to the extent of requiring plaintiff to provide authorizations for production of his medical, psychological, and psychiatric records, for the period beginning five years before the accident, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The material and necessary standard is to be interpreted liberally to require disclosure of any facts bearing on the controversy which will assist preparation for trial by sharpening the issues and reducing prolixity (see Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. Co., 21 NY2d 403, 406 [1968]).

Plaintiff alleged that he sustained numerous physical and psychological injuries, including depression, from the accident, and that they permanently impacted his ability to work. Defendants are entitled to disclosure of his entire medical history, including any psychological or psychiatric records, because his overall health directly bears on how many years he realistically could have continued to work had no accident occurred (see Velez v Daar, 41 AD3d 164, 166 [1st Dept 2007]).

However, defendant failed to demonstrate that plaintiff’s school records and tax returns were relevant and material (see Monica W. v Milevoi, 252 AD2d 260, 262 [1st Dept 1999]; Nanbar Realty Corp. v Pater Realty Co., 242 AD2d 208, 209-210 [1st Dept 1997]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Maz-zarelli, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stile v. C-Air Customhouse Brokers-Forwards, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
Louis v. Hudson 36 LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 34236(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Joseph v. Edun
2023 NY Slip Op 00238 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
American Med. Alert Corp. v. Evanston Ins. Co.
2019 NY Slip Op 1659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Kanaly v. DeMartino
2018 NY Slip Op 4060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 2894, 149 A.D.3d 508, 51 N.Y.S.3d 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyes-v-lexington-79th-corp-nyappdiv-2017.