Louis v. Hudson 36 LLC
This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 34236(U) (Louis v. Hudson 36 LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Louis v Hudson 36 LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 34236(U) November 26, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155660/2020 Judge: Sabrina Kraus Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/2024 03 :20 PM] INDEX NO. 15566 0/ 2 0 2 0 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. SABRINA KRAUS PART 57M Justice ---------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 155660/2020 DARNELL LOUIS, MOTION DATE 09/27/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. _ _ _00_1_ __ - V-
HUDSON 36 LLC, DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION Defendant. --------------------------------,------------------X
HUDSON 36 LLC Third-Party Index No. 595525/2021 Plaintiff,
-against-
LALEZARIAN PROPERTIES LLC
Defendant. ,________________________,_ _ _ -----------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 37, 38, 53, 54, 55 were read on this motion to/for STRIKE PLEADINGS
Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for personal injuries sustained when
plaintiff tripped and fell on a wooden plank, causing serious injury to his left hand and left
shoulder.
The summons and complaint were filed on July 23, 2020.
Defendant served and filed an answer on October 20, 2020, and the parties proceeded to
engage in discovery.
The most recent status conference order, issued on May 15, 2024, stated plaintiff had
failed to appear for an Independent Medical Examination (IME) three times and agreed to pay
155660/2020 LOUIS, DARNELL vs. HUDSON 36 LLC Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 001
1 of 4 [* 1] [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/2024 03:20 P~ INDEX NO. 155660/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2024
the fees associated with missing those appointments. Defendant was granted leave to move for
appropriate relief.
On October 28, 2024, defendant moved to strike the complaint for failure to appear at the
IME and to compel payment for the missed appointments.
On October 31, 2024, the court conferenced the pending motion with the parties. Plaintiff
did submit payment for the costs associated with the missed appointments and defendant agreed
to give plaintiff until December 31, 2024 to appear for an IME. However, the parties could not
agree on the appropriate relief if plaintiff failed to appear again.
"The determination whether to strike a pleading for failure to comply with court-ordered
disclosure lies within the sound discretion of the trial court" (Fishbane v Chelsea Hall, LLC, 65
AD3d 1079, 1081 [2d Dept 2009]).
" ... [T]he drastic remedy of striking a pleading pursuant to CPLR 3126 should not be
imposed unless the failure to comply with discovery demands or orders is clearly willful and
contumacious. Willful and contumacious conduct may be inferred from a party's repeated failure
to comply with court-ordered discovery, coupled with inadequate explanations for the failures to
comply or a failure to comply with court-ordered discovery over an extended period of time"
(Orgel v Stewart Tit. Ins. Co., 91 AD3d 922, 923 [2d Dept 2012] [internal quotation marks and
citations omitted]).
It is well established that the willful failure to appear for an IME may warrant dismissal
of the action (see e.g., Aziz v City ofNew York, 130 AD3d 451 [1st Dept 2015]).
CPLR 3101 (a) provides in pertinent part "[t]here shall be full disclosure of all matter
material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action, regardless of the burden of
proof .... " The words "material and necessary" have been "interpreted liberally to require
155660/2020 LOUIS, DARNELL vs. HUDSON 36 LLC Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 001
2 of 4 [* 2] [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/2024 03:20 P~ INDEX NO. 155660/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2024
disclosure ... of any facts bearing on the controversy which will assist preparation for trial by
sharpening the issues and reducing delay and prolixity." Allen v Crowell - Collier Puhl. Co., 21
NY2d 403,406 [1968]; Reyes v Lexington 79th Corp., 149 AD3d 508,508 [1st Dept 2017]).
As plaintiff alleges severe and permanent injuries and an IME of those injuries is
obviously relevant to the defense of this action.
Defendant asserts that although they have missed the orthopedic IME, they have appeared
for two other IME's. As the parties were prepared to stipulate to allowing defendant one final
opportunity to appear for the IME, the court issues the following conditional order:
The defendant having established that plaintiff has willfully and contumaciously failed to appear
for an orthopedic IME as directed in the preliminary conference order of this court dated July 18,
2022, and in the orders dated January 12, 2023; May 8, 2023; August 3, 2023; January 10, 2024;
May 15, 2024; and the plaintiff having failed to offer any justification for such conduct; it is
hereby
ORDERED that defendant's motion is granted as follows:
ORDERED that the issue of seriousness or permanence of the injury as would be
contemplated by the orthopedic IME shall be deemed to be resolved in favor of defendant unless,
the plaintiff appears for the orthopedic IME by January 17, 2025; and it is further
ORDERED that, within 20 days from entry of this order, defendant shall serve a copy of
this order with notice of entry on plaintiff and the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office (60 Centre
Street, Room 119); and it is further
ORDERED that such service upon the Clerk shall be made in accordance with the
procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically
155660/2020 LOUIS, DARNELL vs. HUDSON 36 LLC Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 001
[* 3] 3 of 4 [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/2024 03:20 P~ INDEX NO. 155660/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2024
Filed Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's website at the address
www.nycourts.gov/supctmanh).
This constitutes the decision and order of the court.
11/26/2024 DATE
~ CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON- AL DISPO
GRANTED □ DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
155660/2020 LOUIS, DARNELL vs. HUDSON 36 LLC Page 4 of 4 Motion No. 001
4 of 4 [* 4]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 NY Slip Op 34236(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-v-hudson-36-llc-nysupctnewyork-2024.