Reyes v. Arias
This text of Reyes v. Arias (Reyes v. Arias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
MONICA REYES, individually, and as guardian and next friend, Jane Doe, a minor child,
Plaintiffs, vs. No. 2:19-cv-00601-KG-KRS
FRANK RAMOS ARIAS, and SILVER CITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS
Defendants.
ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM On upon the application of the Plaintiff, Monica Reyes, as guardian and next friend of Jane Doe, a minor child, for the appointment of a guardian ad litem to act on behalf of her minor child, Jane Doe, and the Court, having found good cause to do so, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Nicole Charlebois, Attorney at Law, shall be appointed as a guardian ad litem to advise the Court as to the merits of any settlement reached on behalf of the Plaintiff in her capacity as guardian and next friend the minor child and whether it is in the best interest of the minor child, Jane Doe; IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the guardian ad litem shall have the following powers: a. To meet with Monica Reyes and her attorney at law; b. To meet with Jane Doe; c. To conduct an independent investigation, including a review of all medical and psychological records regarding Jane Doe, if necessary, to ascertain whether the settlement reached in the above-captioned matter is in the best interest of the minor child; d. To meet with Jane Doe’s physicians and psychologist, if appropriate; e. To advise the Court as to how the funds should distributed in the best interest of Jane Doe. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the appointment of the guardian ad litem does not contemplate representation of any minor child as an advocate but only as a functionary of the Court. All immunities and privileges to the guardian ad litem, as articulated in the Supreme Court Case of Collins v. Tabet, 111 N.M. 391, 806 P2d. 40 (1991), shall be extended to the guardian ad litem in this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the duties and the responsibilities of the guardian ad litem and her appointment shall terminate upon approval of any settlement reached in this matter.
/ ie Sr 2 ALA— UNITED STATES‘DISTRIC¥ JUDGE
DUHIGG, CRONIN, SPRING & BERLIN, P.A.
Approved electronically David M. Berlin, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 527 Albuquerque, NM 87103 (505) 243-3751 dmberl@duhigglaw.com
HOLT MYNATT MARTINEZ, P.C.
Approved by Response filed 09/13/19 Blaine Mynatt, Esq. Attorney for Frank Ramos Arias P.O. Box 2699 Las Cruces, NM 88004 (575) 524-8812 bmt@hmm-law.com
WALZ AND ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Telephonically approved Jerry A. Walz, Esq. Attorney for Silver City Consolidated Schools 133 Eubank Blvd NE Albuquerque, NM 87123 (505) 275-1800 jerryawalz@walzandassociates.com
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reyes v. Arias, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyes-v-arias-nmd-2019.