Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead

124 So. 2d 776, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 1216
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 5, 1960·No. No. 21266·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

SAMUEL, Judge.

The appellant did not make an appearance when this case was regularly called for argument, nor has he filed a brief herein. The appellee alone has appeared and lie has submitted the case and moved that the judgment be affirmed.

Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of the lower court, that judgment may be affirmed under the presumption that it is correct. Delpit v. Delpit, 1957, 232 La. 539, 94 So.2d 660; Perkins et al. v. Buchler et al., 1953, 223 La. 179, 65 So.2d 130; Succession of Bailey, 1957, 232 La. 824, 95 So.2d 326.

We have examined the record and find no error patent on the face thereof.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, appellant to pay all costs.

Affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead, 124 So. 2d 776, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 1216 (La. Ct. App. 1960).

124 So. 2d 776 (Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Modern Appliance & Supply, Inc. v. Sapp
200 So. 2d 363 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1967)
Bader Finance Co. v. Asset
169 So. 2d 220 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Garrison v. Kuntz
166 So. 2d 295 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
F. A. B. Distributing Co. v. Marullo
138 So. 2d 656 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1962)