Garrison v. Kuntz

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Garrison v. Kuntz

166 So. 2d 295, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1856

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 15, 1964

DocketNo. 1377

StatusPublished

This text of 166 So. 2d 295 (Garrison v. Kuntz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garrison v. Kuntz, 166 So. 2d 295, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1856 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

CHRIS T. BARNETTE, Judge pro tem.

From a judgment abating a public nuisance and enjoining the continuance of the same, the defendant has appealed. The appellant made an appearance when the case was regularly called for argument and submitted the same without argument and without filing brief. The appellee appeared and submitted brief and moved that the judgment appealed from be affirmed.

Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of tire lower court, that judgment may be affirmed under the presumption that it is correct Rex Finance Company v. Morehead, La.App., 124 So.2d 776; Alice v. Woods, La.App., 124 So.2d 770; Succession of Bailey, 232 La. 824, 95 So.2d 326; Delpit v. Delpit, 232 La. 539, 94 So.2d 660; Perkins et al. v. Buchler et al., 223 La. 179, 65 So.2d 130.

We have examined the record and find no error patent on the face thereof.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, appellant to pay all costs.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI