Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 563 F.3d 1358
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 21, 2010·No. 2010-1029·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

REVOLUTION EYEWEAR, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

and

GARY MARTIN ZELMAN, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

v.

ASPEX EYEWEAR, INC. and NONU IFERGAN, Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants. ____________________

2010-1029 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Case No. 03-CV-5965, Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

R. JOSEPH TROJAN, Trojan Law Offices, of Beverly Hills, California, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee and counterclaim defendant-appellee.

MICHAEL A. NICODEMA, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellants. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MAYER, and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 21, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc. (Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.