Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
REVOLUTION EYEWEAR, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,
and
GARY MARTIN ZELMAN, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,
v.
ASPEX EYEWEAR, INC. and NONU IFERGAN, Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants. ____________________
2010-1029 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Case No. 03-CV-5965, Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
R. JOSEPH TROJAN, Trojan Law Offices, of Beverly Hills, California, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee and counterclaim defendant-appellee.
MICHAEL A. NICODEMA, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellants. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MAYER, and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 21, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc. (Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.