Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.
This text of Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc. (Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
REVOLUTION EYEWEAR, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,
and
GARY MARTIN ZELMAN, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,
v.
ASPEX EYEWEAR, INC. and NONU IFERGAN, Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants. ____________________
2010-1029 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Case No. 03-CV-5965, Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
R. JOSEPH TROJAN, Trojan Law Offices, of Beverly Hills, California, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee and counterclaim defendant-appellee.
MICHAEL A. NICODEMA, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellants. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MAYER, and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 21, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/revolution-eyewear-inc-v-aspex-eyewear-inc-cafc-2010.