Revheim v. Shankman

62 N.E.2d 781, 294 N.Y. 872, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 1057
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Revheim v. Shankman. Read the opinion of the Court — 293 N.Y. 850
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 1945·Published

Opinion

Motion by defendants-respondents and appellants to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned amended to read as follows: Judgment, insofar as appealed from by plaintiff affirmed; and judgment, insofar as appealed from by defendants reversed and the supplemental complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs in all courts to the defendants, on the ground that the executory accord was invalid under section 33-a, subdivision 2, of the Personal Property Law and that there was no breach of the agreement alleged in the original complaint and restitution to the defendants of all property and rights lost by means of the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs granted and matter remitted to the Supreme Court to make such orders and to issue such process or mandates as may be necessary or appropriate to effect such restitution. [See 293 N. Y. 850.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Revheim v. Shankman, 62 N.E.2d 781, 294 N.Y. 872, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 1057 (N.Y. 1945).

62 N.E.2d 781 (Revheim v. Shankman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Revheim v. Shankman
59 N.E.2d 441 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)