Revheim v. Shankman

New York Court of Appeals

Revheim v. Shankman

59 N.E.2d 441, 293 N.Y. 850, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2267

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 22, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 N.E.2d 441 (Revheim v. Shankman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Revheim v. Shankman, 59 N.E.2d 441, 293 N.Y. 850, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2267 (N.Y. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, insofar as appealed from by plaintiff, affirmed; and judgment, insofar as appealed from by defendants, reversed, and the supplemental complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs in all courts to the defendants, on the ground that the executory accord was invalid under section 33-a, subdivision 2, of the Personal Property Law, and that there was no breach of the agreement alleged in the original complaint. No opinion. (See 294 N. Y. 662.)

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughkan, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, insofar as appealed from by plaintiff, affirmed; and judgment, insofar as appealed from by defendants, reversed, and the supplemental complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs in all courts to the defendants, on the ground that the executory accord was invalid under section 33-a, subdivision 2, of the Personal Property Law, and that there was no breach of the agreement alleged in the original complaint. No opinion. (See 294 N. Y. 662.)

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughkan, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 N.E.2d 441, 293 N.Y. 850, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/revheim-v-shankman-ny-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack