Revheim v. Shankman

59 N.E.2d 441, 293 N.Y. 850, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2267
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 1944·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, insofar as appealed from by plaintiff, affirmed; and judgment, insofar as appealed from by defendants, reversed, and the supplemental complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs in all courts to the defendants, on the ground that the executory accord was invalid under section 33-a, subdivision 2, of the Personal Property Law, and that there was no breach of the agreement alleged in the original complaint. No opinion. (See 294 N. Y. 662.)

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughkan, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Revheim v. Shankman, 59 N.E.2d 441, 293 N.Y. 850, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2267 (N.Y. 1944).

59 N.E.2d 441 (Revheim v. Shankman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Revheim v. Shankman
60 N.E.2d 389 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)