Reutter v. McCall

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Reutter v. McCall

43 A. 398, 192 Pa. 77, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 882

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 24, 1899

DocketAppeal, No. 206

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 43 A. 398 (Reutter v. McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reutter v. McCall, 43 A. 398, 192 Pa. 77, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 882 (Pa. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

There is no possible doubt, under all the authorities, that John Reutter took an estate in fee under the will of his father in the land in question. The question presented is only an ordinary instance of the direct application of the rule in Shelley’s case. The whole subject was so fully discussed in the opinion of the lower court in the case of Grimes v. Shirk, 169 Pa. 74, that a mere reference thereto is sufficient.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

There is no possible doubt, under all the authorities, that John Reutter took an estate in fee under the will of his father in the land in question. The question presented is only an ordinary instance of the direct application of the rule in Shelley’s case. The whole subject was so fully discussed in the opinion of the lower court in the case of Grimes v. Shirk, 169 Pa. 74, that a mere reference thereto is sufficient.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A. 398, 192 Pa. 77, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reutter-v-mccall-pa-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack