Grimes v. Shirk
32 A. 113, 169 Pa. 74, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1072
Opinion
The question presented in this case was well considered and rightly disposed of by the court below. It is unnecessary to add anything to what has been said by the learned president of the common pleas in his able and exhaustive opinion sent up with the record. On that opinion we affirm the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grimes v. Shirk, 32 A. 113, 169 Pa. 74, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1072 (Pa. 1895).
32 A. 113 (Grimes v. Shirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lippincott's Estate
48 Pa. D. & C. 587 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1943)
Johnson's Estate
15 Pa. D. & C. 347 (Crawford County Orphans' Court, 1930)
Lyman v. Lyman
143 A. 200 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Pfeifle v. Bethlehem Public Library, Inc.
11 Pa. D. & C. 555 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)
Glenn v. Stewart
108 A. 599 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Packer's Estate
92 A. 70 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Stout v. Good
91 A. 613 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Lee v. Sanson
91 A. 611 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Harrison v. Harris
91 A. 617 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Kyner v. Hockersmith
84 A. 506 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)
Breinig v. Oldt
45 Pa. Super. 629 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Wilson v. Heilman
68 A. 674 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Hogg's Estate
27 Pa. Super. 428 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Doyle v. Andis
69 L.R.A. 953 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1905)
Bright v. Esterly
48 A. 810 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1901)
McGregor v. Davidson
14 Pa. Super. 230 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)
Reimer v. Reimer
44 A. 316 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Reutter v. McCall
43 A. 398 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Seybert v. Hibbert
5 Pa. Super. 537 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)