Retterer v. Whirlpool Corp.

729 N.E.2d 760, 89 Ohio St. 3d 1215
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 21, 2000·No. No. 99-818·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

The court orders that the court of appeals’ opinion not be published in the Ohio Official Reports and that it may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur separately. Douglas, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Retterer v. Whirlpool Corp., 729 N.E.2d 760, 89 Ohio St. 3d 1215 (Ohio 2000).

729 N.E.2d 760 (Retterer v. Whirlpool Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Inskeep v. W. Res. Transit Auth.
2013 Ohio 897 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)
Retterer v. Whirlpool Corp.
2000 Ohio 129 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)