Retail Services WIS Corporation D/B/A Product Connections, Nathan Stout, Amanda Villa, and Katherine Palmer v. Crossmark, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 6, 2021
Docket05-20-00937-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Retail Services WIS Corporation D/B/A Product Connections, Nathan Stout, Amanda Villa, and Katherine Palmer v. Crossmark, Inc. (Retail Services WIS Corporation D/B/A Product Connections, Nathan Stout, Amanda Villa, and Katherine Palmer v. Crossmark, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Retail Services WIS Corporation D/B/A Product Connections, Nathan Stout, Amanda Villa, and Katherine Palmer v. Crossmark, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Order entered January 6, 2021

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-20-00937-CV

RETAIL SERVICES WIS CORPORATION D/B/A PRODUCT CONNECTIONS, NATHAN STOUT, AMANDA VILLA, AND KATHERINE PALMER, Appellants

V.

CROSSMARK, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-05122-2020

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s January 4, 2021 unopposed motion for leave

to file its brief under seal. Appellee explains it seeks to file its brief under seal to

comply with the trial court’s order temporarily sealing certain documents and

testimony upon which appellee relies in its brief.

We GRANT the motion. We ORDER appellee to file an unredacted brief

no later than January 8, 2021 and DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to SEAL the brief upon filing. The brief shall remain under seal pending the trial court’s

hearing to permanently seal the exhibits and testimony at issue. Appellee is

DIRECTED to notify the Court within TEN DAYS of any permanent sealing

ruling by the trial court.

We note volumes 3 and 5 of the supplemental clerk’s record omitted certain

documents that were designated to be included in the record, and corrected

volumes have been filed. To avoid confusion, we STRIKE the original volumes 3

and 5 of the supplemental clerk’s record filed November 23, 2020 and December

17, 2020, respectively. The appeal will proceed on the corrected volumes filed

December 4 and 18, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Retail Services WIS Corporation D/B/A Product Connections, Nathan Stout, Amanda Villa, and Katherine Palmer v. Crossmark, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/retail-services-wis-corporation-dba-product-connections-nathan-stout-texapp-2021.