Restrepo v. Jaramillo
134 N.Y.S. 352
Opinion
The papers upon which the attachment was granted, and on which the motion to vacate is based, are fatally defective. The action is for unliquidated damages, and there is nothing in the papers upon which the court can determine what damages, if any, the plaintiffs are entitled to recover. James v. Signell, 60 App. Div. 75, 69 N. Y. Supp. 680; Haskell v. Osborn, 33 App. Div. 127, 53 N. Y. Supp. 361.
It follows that the order appealed from must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Restrepo v. Jaramillo, 134 N.Y.S. 352 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).
134 N.Y.S. 352 (Restrepo v. Jaramillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haskell v. Osborn
33 A.D. 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
James v. Signell
60 A.D. 75 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
James v. Signell
69 N.Y.S. 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)