Restrepo v. Jaramillo

149 A.D. 941

This text of 149 A.D. 941 (Restrepo v. Jaramillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Restrepo v. Jaramillo, 149 A.D. 941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Scott, J.:

The papers upon which the attachment was granted and on which the motion to vacate is based are fatally defective. The action is for unliquidated damages and there is nothing in the papers upon which the court can determine what damages, if any, the plaintiffs are entitled to recover. (James v. Signell, 60 App. Div. 75; Haskell v. Osborn, 33 id. 128.) It follows that the order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke and Miller, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. _

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James v. Signell
60 A.D. 75 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 A.D. 941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/restrepo-v-jaramillo-nyappdiv-1912.