Restituyo v. Berbary

278 A.D.2d 859, 718 N.Y.S.2d 747, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13588
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2000·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the CPLR article 78 petition seeking reinstatement of petitioner into the sexual offenders treatment group at Collins Correctional Facility. “ Tt is well settled that a court may not substitute its judgment for that of the board or body it reviews unless the decision under review is arbitrary and unreasonable and constitutes an abuse of discretion’ ” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 232, quoting Matter of Diocese of Rochester v Planning Bd., 1 NY2d 508, 520; see, Matter of Arrocha v Board of Educ., 93 NY2d 361, 363-364; Matter of Wagschal v Board of Examiners, 69 NY2d 672, 674). The court failed to find that respondents’ determination was arbitrary and unreasonable or an abuse of discretion, nor would the record support such a finding. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Restituyo v. Berbary, 278 A.D.2d 859, 718 N.Y.S.2d 747, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 859 (Restituyo v. Berbary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Graham v. Annucci
2021 NY Slip Op 02652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
BROCKPORT STUDENT GOVERNMENT v. STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY AT BROCKPORT
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
Brockport Student Government v. State University
136 A.D.3d 1418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
La Rocco v. Goord
19 A.D.3d 1073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)