Republic of Cuba v. Ritter

130 So. 2d 98, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2735
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 1961·No. No. 60-602·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal which sought to review certain interlocutory rulings in an action at law. The appeal was improvidently filed because interlocutory appeals in common-law actions are limited to those orders relating to venue or jurisdiction over [99] the person.1 As authorized by statute,2 we have treated the notice of appeal as a petition for common-law certiorari. See Ludwig v. Cochran, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 484; Kautzman v. Bandler, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 256.

The burden of clearly demonstrating that the trial court has acted without and in excess of its jurisdiction or its rulings do not conform to the essential requirements of the law is upon the petitioners. They have failed to carry this burden and by reason thereof, the petition for certiorari should be and it is hereby denied.

It is so ordered.

Norton, c. j., carroll, chas., J., slnd SMITH, D. R., Associate Judge, concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Republic of Cuba v. Ritter, 130 So. 2d 98, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2735 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

130 So. 2d 98 (Republic of Cuba v. Ritter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danluck v. Lotspeich Co.
334 So. 2d 32 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Stein v. Bayfront Medical Center, Inc.
287 So. 2d 401 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Republic of Cuba v. Ritter
135 So. 2d 740 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)