Ludwig v. Cochran

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ludwig v. Cochran

114 So. 2d 484

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 24, 1959·No. No. B-21·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was improvidently taken from a Circuit Court order denying a motion and a petition for certiorari directed to an order of the appellee as Director of [485] the State Beverage Department. This Court, pursuant to Section 59.45, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which is applicable to District Courts of Appeal of Florida (Alliance for Conservation of Natural Resources in Pinellas County v. Furen, Fla.App., 104 So.2d 803; Wright v. Roller, Fla.App., 111 So.2d 485) regards the notice of appeal and the record herein as a petition for certiorari duly presented to this Court.

So considered, and finding ho error, cer-tiorari is denied.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was improvidently taken from a Circuit Court order denying a motion and a petition for certiorari directed to an order of the appellee as Director of [485] the State Beverage Department. This Court, pursuant to Section 59.45, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which is applicable to District Courts of Appeal of Florida (Alliance for Conservation of Natural Resources in Pinellas County v. Furen, Fla.App., 104 So.2d 803; Wright v. Roller, Fla.App., 111 So.2d 485) regards the notice of appeal and the record herein as a petition for certiorari duly presented to this Court.

So considered, and finding ho error, cer-tiorari is denied.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.

Ludwig v. Cochran, 114 So. 2d 484 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

114 So. 2d 484 (Ludwig v. Cochran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related