Ludwig v. Cochran

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ludwig v. Cochran

114 So. 2d 484

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 24, 1959

DocketNo. B-21

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 114 So. 2d 484 (Ludwig v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ludwig v. Cochran, 114 So. 2d 484 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was improvidently taken from a Circuit Court order denying a motion and a petition for certiorari directed to an order of the appellee as Director of [485]*485the State Beverage Department. This Court, pursuant to Section 59.45, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which is applicable to District Courts of Appeal of Florida (Alliance for Conservation of Natural Resources in Pinellas County v. Furen, Fla.App., 104 So.2d 803; Wright v. Roller, Fla.App., 111 So.2d 485) regards the notice of appeal and the record herein as a petition for certiorari duly presented to this Court.

So considered, and finding ho error, cer-tiorari is denied.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was improvidently taken from a Circuit Court order denying a motion and a petition for certiorari directed to an order of the appellee as Director of [485]*485the State Beverage Department. This Court, pursuant to Section 59.45, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which is applicable to District Courts of Appeal of Florida (Alliance for Conservation of Natural Resources in Pinellas County v. Furen, Fla.App., 104 So.2d 803; Wright v. Roller, Fla.App., 111 So.2d 485) regards the notice of appeal and the record herein as a petition for certiorari duly presented to this Court.

So considered, and finding ho error, cer-tiorari is denied.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 So. 2d 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludwig-v-cochran-fladistctapp-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack