Home/Supreme Court/Reogas v. Gray

Reogas v. Gray

527 U.S. 1018, 144 L. Ed. 2d 768, 119 S. Ct. 2363, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4205, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6207, 67 U.S.L.W. 3771, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4818
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 21, 1999
DocketNo. 97-1988
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 527 U.S. 1018 (Reogas v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reogas v. Gray, 527 U.S. 1018, 144 L. Ed. 2d 768, 119 S. Ct. 2363, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4205, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6207, 67 U.S.L.W. 3771, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4818 (1999).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and ease remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775, 118 S.Ct. 2275, 141 L.Ed.2d 662 (1998), and 11 U.S.C. Sec. 362. Justice SCALIA would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari, and vacate the judgment below. Costs under Rule 43.2 are not allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sevilla-Briones
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
State v. Pender
720 S.E.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2012)
State v. Collins
10 A.3d 1005 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
State v. Waring
701 S.E.2d 615 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)
Ramos v. Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement
179 F. App'x 239 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
State v. Alvarez
608 S.E.2d 371 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Bell
592 S.E.2d 200 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Tirado
599 S.E.2d 515 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2004)
State v. Tirado
599 S.E.2d 515 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Hyatt
566 S.E.2d 61 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)
State v. Williams
565 S.E.2d 609 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)
State v. Holadia
561 S.E.2d 514 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
State v. Lucas
548 S.E.2d 712 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2001)
State v. Meyer
540 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2000)
Howard v. Henderson
112 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (M.D. Alabama, 2000)
State v. Golphin
533 S.E.2d 168 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2000)
State v. Lemons
530 S.E.2d 542 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2000)
Castenson v. City of Harcourt
86 F. Supp. 2d 866 (N.D. Iowa, 2000)
State v. Leggett
519 S.E.2d 328 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Reogas v. Gray
185 F.3d 1216 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
527 U.S. 1018, 144 L. Ed. 2d 768, 119 S. Ct. 2363, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4205, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6207, 67 U.S.L.W. 3771, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reogas-v-gray-scotus-1999.