Reogas v. Gray
This text of 185 F.3d 1216 (Reogas v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PUBLISH
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ---------------------- U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 96-6767 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT --------------------- 08/26/99 D. C. Docket No. CV 94-B-2216-NW THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK
CARMEN REOGAS, WANDA GIBSON, KAREN HOWARD,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus
JIMMY GRAY, MONARCH TILE, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees,
____________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _____________________________________________ (August 26, 1999)
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before DUBINA, Circuit Judge, HILL and GIBSON*, Senior Circuit Judges.
_____________ *Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior U. S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM:
The judgment of this court, an unpublished affirmance dated
January 6, 1998, having been vacated by the Supreme Court, Reogas v. Gray,
____U.S.___, 119 S.Ct. 2363, ___L.Ed.2d___ (1999), and the premises
considered,
IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is VACATED and
the case is REMANDED to that court for further consideration in light of Faragher
v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) and 11 U.S.C. Section 362.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 F.3d 1216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reogas-v-gray-ca11-1999.