Reno Raceway, Inc. v. Sierra Paving, Inc.
This text of 492 P.2d 127 (Reno Raceway, Inc. v. Sierra Paving, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
This appeal is from an order of the district court refusing to set aside a default judgment entered against defendants who had appeared in the action. The record shows that the plaintiff failed to serve written notice of its application for default judgment upon the defendants as required by NRCP 55(b)(2). 1 This failure voids the judgment. Ray v. Stecher, 79 Nev. 304, 311, 383 P.2d 372 (1963). The appellants are given ten days after remittitur within which to answer.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Rule 55(b)(2): “ ... If the party against whom judgment by default is sought has appeared in the action, he . . . shall be served with written notice of the application for judgment at least 3 days prior to the hearing on such application. . . .”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
492 P.2d 127, 87 Nev. 619, 1971 Nev. LEXIS 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reno-raceway-inc-v-sierra-paving-inc-nev-1971.