American General Finance Corp. v. First Commercial Title, Inc.

524 P.2d 1270, 90 Nev. 303, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 384
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided August 1, 1974·No. No. 7406·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[304]*304OPINION

Per Curiam:

This case began with a complaint seeking judgment for a deficiency allegedly remaining after foreclosure sale of real property pursuant to the terms of a deed of trust. The district court granted the plaintiff-respondent’s motion for summary judgment in the sum of $74,648.95 plus interest, without requiring a hearing on notice to the defendant-appellants, as NRS 40.457(1) expressly requires, and this appeal follows.1

It seems that prior to entry of summary judgment, a purported hearing was held, but that the plaintiff-respondent’s counsel inadvertently omitted to serve the defendant-appellants’ then counsel with notice thereof. Manifestly, the proceedings at that purported hearing were void. Turner v. Saka, 90 Nev. 54, 518 P.2d 608 (1974); Maheu v. District Court, 88 Nev. 26, 493 P.2d 709 (1972); Reno Raceway, Inc. v. Sierra Paving, 87 Nev. 619, 492 P.2d 127 (1971).

Subsequently, on the basis of expert testimony concerning value taken at such “hearing,” counsel for the plaintiff-respondent moved for summary judgment, this time giving notice. In opposition, counsel for the defendant-appellants submitted the affidavit of the individual defendant, clearly stating that a hearing was desired and that opposing expert testimony regarding value was available. However, notwithstanding this, the [305]*305district court entered summary judgment, without permitting a hearing.

• This was error. In our view, a district court may not deny an alleged debtor the right to a full hearing on the issue of value, which NRS 40.457(1) envisions, at least where the alleged debtor has not either expressly or by implication waived his right to cross-examine the plaintiff’s witnesses or to present his own.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American General Finance Corp. v. First Commercial Title, Inc., 524 P.2d 1270, 90 Nev. 303, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 384 (Neb. 1974).

524 P.2d 1270 (American General Finance Corp. v. First Commercial Title, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cxa-10 Corp. v. Barry Ford
671 F. App'x 672 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Pahrump 194, LLC
51 F. Supp. 3d 993 (D. Nevada, 2014)