Reniece Kabando v. Dana Boente
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1157
RENIECE L.W. KABANDO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DANA JAMES BOENTE, United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia; DENNIS C. BARGHAAN, JR., Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia; STEVEN E. GORDON, Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00076-AJT-TCB)
Submitted: March 6, 2017 Decided: March 13, 2017
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reniece L.W. Kabando, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Reniece L.W. Kabando seeks to appeal the district court’s
January 27, 2017, order denying her self-styled “Amended Motion
to Exparte” and amended motion to expedite. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
order Kabando seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reniece Kabando v. Dana Boente (Reniece Kabando v. Dana Boente) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.