Reniece Kabando v. Dana Boente

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 2017
Docket17-1157
StatusUnpublished

This text of Reniece Kabando v. Dana Boente (Reniece Kabando v. Dana Boente) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reniece Kabando v. Dana Boente, (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1157

RENIECE L.W. KABANDO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DANA JAMES BOENTE, United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia; DENNIS C. BARGHAAN, JR., Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia; STEVEN E. GORDON, Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00076-AJT-TCB)

Submitted: March 6, 2017 Decided: March 13, 2017

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reniece L.W. Kabando, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Reniece L.W. Kabando seeks to appeal the district court’s

January 27, 2017, order denying her self-styled “Amended Motion

to Exparte” and amended motion to expedite. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The

order Kabando seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Reniece Kabando v. Dana Boente, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reniece-kabando-v-dana-boente-ca4-2017.