Remeneski v. McDonald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Remeneski v. McDonald

237 A.D.2d 204, 655 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2770

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 237 A.D.2d 204 (Remeneski v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Remeneski v. McDonald, 237 A.D.2d 204, 655 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bernard Burstein, J., and a jury), entered March 21, 1996, which awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $300,000, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The damages awarded to plaintiff did not deviate from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances (CPLR 5501 [c]). Plaintiff sustained a debilitating wrist fracture as well as a significant complex tear of the medial meniscus of [205]*205the knee, each causing progressive and permanent disability (see, Kotopoulos v Nathan Hale Gardens, 235 AD2d 276; Rodriguez v City of New York, 191 AD2d 420; Gonzalez v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 160 AD2d 420). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bernard Burstein, J., and a jury), entered March 21, 1996, which awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $300,000, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The damages awarded to plaintiff did not deviate from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances (CPLR 5501 [c]). Plaintiff sustained a debilitating wrist fracture as well as a significant complex tear of the medial meniscus of [205]*205the knee, each causing progressive and permanent disability (see, Kotopoulos v Nathan Hale Gardens, 235 AD2d 276; Rodriguez v City of New York, 191 AD2d 420; Gonzalez v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 160 AD2d 420). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D.2d 204, 655 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/remeneski-v-mcdonald-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack