Garcia v. Spira

273 A.D.2d 57, 709 N.Y.S.2d 53, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6373
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 8, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 273 A.D.2d 57 (Garcia v. Spira) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. Spira, 273 A.D.2d 57, 709 N.Y.S.2d 53, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice Bowman, J.), entered January 25, 2000, awarding plaintiffs damages, before structuring, of $300,000, $340,000 and $50,000 for past and future pain and suffering and loss of consortium, respectively, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate the awards of damages and to direct a new trial on the issue of damages only, and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless, within 30 days from the date of this order, the injured plaintiff stipulates to reduce the awards for past and future pain and suffering to $130,000 and $160,000, respectively, and plaintiff spouse stipulates to reduce the award for loss of consortium to $10,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about October 25, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict as excessive, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed within the appeal from the judgment.

The awards are excessive to the extent indicated, where the injured plaintiff, who sustained a fracture to her nondominant wrist in a fall on a defective sidewalk, is able to perform most of her usual preaccident activities and feels pain only when the weather is bad (cf., Remeneski v McDonald, 237 AD2d 204; Kotopoulos v Nathan Hale Gardens, 235 AD2d 276; Almada v Long Is. Light. Co., 246 AD2d 563), and plaintiff spouse presented only some evidence of changes in his life caused by his wife’s diminished ability to perform household chores. Concur— Tom, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dispensa v. Medical Diagnostic Imaging, PLLC
2026 NY Slip Op 00492 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
Sinera v. Embassy House Eat LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 00057 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Erosa v. Coomaraswamy
129 A.D.3d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Conley v. City of New York
40 A.D.3d 1024 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Zukowski v. Gokhberg
31 A.D.3d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Gerbino v. Tinseltown USA
13 A.D.3d 1068 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Soto v. City of New York
276 A.D.2d 449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 A.D.2d 57, 709 N.Y.S.2d 53, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-spira-nyappdiv-2000.