Relyea v. State

223 S.E.2d 638, 236 Ga. 299, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 845
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 2, 1976
Docket30512
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 223 S.E.2d 638 (Relyea v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Relyea v. State, 223 S.E.2d 638, 236 Ga. 299, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 845 (Ga. 1976).

Opinions

Hall, Justice.

This appeal by a juvenile convicted of a capital offense is completely controlled by Brown v. State, 235 Ga. [300]*300353 (219 SE2d 419). Under the construction of Code Ann. § 24A-301 (b) given by Brown, the superior court and the juvenile court have concurrent jurisdiction over juveniles charged with capital offenses, and whichever court first takes jurisdiction over the matter in question may retain it, subject to the right of the juvenile court to transfer the case to the superior court under Code Ann. § 24A-2501. Like Brown, Relyea was first indicted by the grand jury for the six armed robberies and the motor vehicle theft here in question, and the superior court thereby took jurisdiction over him.

Submitted November 14, 1975 Decided February 2, 1976 Rehearing denied February 17, 1976. James W. Studdard, for appellant. William H. Ison, District Attorney, Douglas N. Peters, Assistant District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Kirby G. Atkinson, Staff Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Relyea asserts in his brief and elsewhere that the juvenile court first took jurisdiction and that he should prevail on this appeal because Code Ann. § 24A-2501 was not followed in a subsequent "transfer” to the superior court. This claim is without merit. The same claim was pressed before the Clayton County Superior Court on March 14, 1975, on Relyea’s motion to determine jurisdiction. The only evidence introduced by Relyea in support of his claim that the juvenile court had previously taken jurisdiction over these offenses was a copy of a juvenile court petition relating to a different offense of motor vehicle theft. Therefore, his claim of juvenile court jurisdiction of the offenses for which he was indicted is totally without support in the record.

The single enumeration of error is therefore without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Ingram, J., who concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Johnson
645 A.2d 234 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
In the Interest of C. R.
430 S.E.2d 3 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1993)
In re J. B.
383 S.E.2d 184 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
In the Interest of D. H. C.
365 S.E.2d 884 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Smith v. State
327 S.E.2d 839 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Couch v. State
325 S.E.2d 366 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1985)
Worthy v. State
324 S.E.2d 431 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1985)
Williams v. State
318 S.E.2d 768 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Crankshaw v. State
247 S.E.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Longshore v. State
238 S.E.2d 22 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
J. T. M. v. State
142 Ga. App. 635 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
JTM v. State
236 S.E.2d 764 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Hartley v. Clack
236 S.E.2d 63 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Williams v. State
232 S.E.2d 535 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
K. G. W. v. State
140 Ga. App. 571 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
KGW v. State of Ga.
231 S.E.2d 421 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Relyea v. State
223 S.E.2d 638 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 S.E.2d 638, 236 Ga. 299, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/relyea-v-state-ga-1976.