Reliance Factoring Corp. v. Commissioner

15 T.C. 604, 1950 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 49
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedNovember 10, 1950
DocketDocket No. 20715
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 15 T.C. 604 (Reliance Factoring Corp. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reliance Factoring Corp. v. Commissioner, 15 T.C. 604, 1950 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 49 (tax 1950).

Opinion

OPINION.

Black, Judge:

The only question we have to decide in this proceeding is this: Is petitioner liable for the 25 per cent penalty for failure to file personal holding company tax returns for the taxable years ended March 31, 1944, and March 31, 1945? The applicable Statute is printed in the margin.1

We think this question under the facts and applicable law must be decided in favor of petitioner. It seems perfectly clear to us that petitioner’s failure to file personal holding company tax returns in each of the years here involved was not due to any willful neglect on its part. It employed a competent and experienced certified public accountant to file its tax returns for each of the years in question and furnished that accountant with all necessary records to enable him to prepare properly its returns. In our findings of fact we have found upon the strength of undisputed evidence that:

* * * All facts relating to the business were disclosed to him because the principals had complete confidence in him. The petitioner’s corporate seal, minute book, stock book, contracts, and other business papers were regularly kept in liis office. His office made regular audits and prepared the [petitioner’s] Federal, state, and city tax returns. * * *

We do not see how under such facts as these it could be held that petitioner’s failure to file personal holding company returns in the tax years here in question was due to “willful neglect.” We hold it was not. We are also convinced that petitioner’s failure to file a personal holding company tax return was due to reasonable cause and we so hold. The facts upon which we base this conclusion are fully stated in our findings of fact and need not be repeated here. Respondent’s imposition of delinquency penalties is reversed.

Reviewed by the Court.

Decision will he entered under Rule 50.

Disney, J., concurs only in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 T.C. 604, 1950 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reliance-factoring-corp-v-commissioner-tax-1950.