Reiss v. Reiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reiss v. Reiss

280 A.D.2d 315, 719 N.Y.S.2d 861, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1392

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 315 (Reiss v. Reiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reiss v. Reiss, 280 A.D.2d 315, 719 N.Y.S.2d 861, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about September 29, 1999, which granted defendant Clara Reiss’s motion to amend her verified answer and for summary judgment on her second counterclaim and dismissing plaintiffs sixth and seventh causes of action, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Plaintiffs appendix does not contain all of the relevant and necessary portions of the record, thus rendering a determination of the appeal on the merits impracticable. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed (see, CPLR 5528 [a] [5]; Matter of Essenberg v MacKay, 272 AD2d 543; Patel v Patel, 270 AD2d 241, appeal dismissed 95 NY2d 899). In any event, based on the materials submitted, there is no basis upon which to disturb the order. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about September 29, 1999, which granted defendant Clara Reiss’s motion to amend her verified answer and for summary judgment on her second counterclaim and dismissing plaintiffs sixth and seventh causes of action, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Plaintiffs appendix does not contain all of the relevant and necessary portions of the record, thus rendering a determination of the appeal on the merits impracticable. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed (see, CPLR 5528 [a] [5]; Matter of Essenberg v MacKay, 272 AD2d 543; Patel v Patel, 270 AD2d 241, appeal dismissed 95 NY2d 899). In any event, based on the materials submitted, there is no basis upon which to disturb the order. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 315, 719 N.Y.S.2d 861, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reiss-v-reiss-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack