Djeddah v. Djeddah

2019 NY Slip Op 4272
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 30, 2019
Docket9470 350094/00
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 4272 (Djeddah v. Djeddah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Djeddah v. Djeddah, 2019 NY Slip Op 4272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Djeddah v Djeddah (2019 NY Slip Op 04272)
Djeddah v Djeddah
2019 NY Slip Op 04272
Decided on May 30, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 30, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Webber, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.

9470 350094/00

[*1]Richard N.J. Djeddah, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Rachel Djeddah, Defendant-Respondent. Goldman & Greenbaum, P.C., Nonparty Respondent.


Richard N.J. Djeddah, appellant pro se.

Judd Burstein P.C., New York (G. William Bartholomew of counsel), for Rachel Djeddah, respondent.

Goldman & Greenbaum, P.C., New York (Sheldon M. Greenbaum of counsel), for Goldman & Greenbaum, P.C., respondent.



Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Matthew F. Cooper, J.), entered on or about October 2, 2018, which denied plaintiff's motion seeking, in effect, leave to reargue and renew a prior order of the same court and Justice, entered on or about May 24, 2017, unanimously dismissed, without costs, for failure to perfect the appeal in compliance with CPLR 5528.

The appendix submitted on this appeal, which does not contain, inter alia, the underlying motion papers, does not afford a basis for review of plaintiff's contentions and or a determination of the purported appeal (see CPLR 5528[a][5]; Kenan v Levine & Blit, PLLC, 136 AD3d 554 [1st Dept 2016]; Reiss v Reiss, 280 AD2d 315 [1st Dept 2001]).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 30, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kenan v. Levine & Blit, PLLC
136 A.D.3d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Reiss v. Reiss
280 A.D.2d 315 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 4272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/djeddah-v-djeddah-nyappdiv-2019.