Reinhold Construction, Inc. v. City Council for City of Vero Beach

429 So. 2d 699, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19512
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 1983·No. 82-2110·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

429 So.2d 699 (1983)

REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant,
v.
CITY COUNCIL FOR the CITY OF VERO BEACH, Florida, Appellee.

No. 82-2110.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 26, 1983.
Rehearing Denied May 5, 1983.

John A. Barley of John A. Barley & Associates, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellant.

Charles P. Vitunac, City Atty., Vero Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reinhold Construction, Inc. appeals a non-final order denying its amended motion for temporary injunction. We affirm.

Appellant failed to establish that it had a clear legal right to the relief requested, one of the essential requirements before a temporary injunction may be granted. Playpen South, Inc. v. City of Oakland Park, 396 So.2d 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). The trial court found that appellant did not meet the clear legal right test because appellant had no substantial likelihood of success on the merits. The trial court's ruling on a motion for injunction comes to this Court with a presumption of correctness and will be reversed only upon a showing of a clear abuse of discretion or a clearly improper ruling. Duvallon v. Duvallon, 409 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Appellant has not met its heavy burden to demonstrate error in the trial court's decision not to grant a temporary injunction.

Accordingly, we affirm the order denying appellant's amended motion for temporary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reinhold Construction, Inc. v. City Council for City of Vero Beach, 429 So. 2d 699, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19512 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

429 So. 2d 699 (Reinhold Construction, Inc. v. City Council for City of Vero Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Haire
832 So. 2d 778 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
First Miami Securities, Inc. v. Bell
758 So. 2d 1229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Benemerito & Flores, MD's v. Roche
751 So. 2d 91 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Emery v. Clifford
721 So. 2d 401 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Gold Coast Chemical Corp. v. Goldberg
668 So. 2d 326 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
PCA Life Ins. Co. v. METROPOLITAN-DADE CTY.
682 So. 2d 1102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
3299 N. Federal Hwy. v. BROWARD CTY. COM'RS
646 So. 2d 215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Jacksonville v. NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADV.
634 So. 2d 750 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement v. Calhoun County
613 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
I & M Associates, Ltd. v. Henry Sklaver, Inc.
612 So. 2d 725 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Langford v. Rotech Oxygen & Med. Equip., Inc.
541 So. 2d 1267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
MID-FLORIDA AT EUSTIS v. Griffin
521 So. 2d 357 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Kreager v. Glickman
519 So. 2d 666 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
MGK PARTNERS v. Cavallo
515 So. 2d 368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
South Fla. Limo., Inc. v. Broward Cty. Av., Dept.
512 So. 2d 1059 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin
482 So. 2d 486 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Thompson v. PLANNING COM'N
464 So. 2d 1231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
In Re Guardianship of DA McW.
429 So. 2d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)