Reilly v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 426
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 10, 1959
DocketNo. 63586; protests 280452-K(A) and 301972-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 43 Cust. Ct. 426 (Reilly v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reilly v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 426 (cusc 1959).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of studs and nails similar in all material respects to those the subject of Fastening Devices, Inc., et al. v. United States (40 Cust. Ct. 345, C.D. 2004), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked “A” at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 332, as modified, supra, for machined studs; (2) the items marked “B” at two-tenths of 1 cent per pound under the provision in paragraph 331, as modified, supra, for nails, made of iron or steel wire, not less than 1 inch in length nor smaller than sixty-five one-thousandths of 1 inch in diameter; and (3) the items marked “C” at 1% cents per pound under paragraph 331 of the act as steel nails, not specially provided for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fastening Devices, Inc. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 345 (U.S. Customs Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Cust. Ct. 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reilly-v-united-states-cusc-1959.