Reilly v. Reilly

254 A.D.2d 361, 688 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10808
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 13, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 254 A.D.2d 361 (Reilly v. Reilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reilly v. Reilly, 254 A.D.2d 361, 688 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the husband appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated August 26, 1996, which, after a hearing, inter alia, imposed a three-year period of protection and [362]*362directed him to refrain from contact with the wife at her home or place of employment.

Ordered that the order is modified by adding to the decretal paragraph thereof providing that the order shall remain in effect until August 26, 1999, a finding that aggravating circumstances exist including violent and harassing behavior by the husband in the presence of the wife and their infant child which constitutes an immediate and ongoing danger to them; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court provided for an extended period of protection without setting forth any aggravating circumstances as required by Family Court Act § 842. Nonetheless, the record reveals that aggravating circumstances exist as the husband, on three different occasions, exhibited violent and harassing behavior either in the presence of the wife alone, or while their infant child was present, which constitutes an immediate and ongoing danger to them. Accordingly, the order of protection is modified to include this finding (see, Family Ct Act § 827 [a] [vii]; § 842; see also, Matter of Mawhirt v Mawhirt, 241 AD2d 524; Matter of Muller v Muller, 221 AD2d 635, 636). Pizzuto, J. P., Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goikhman v. Biton
2020 NY Slip Op 2767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Kondor v. Kondor
109 A.D.3d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Kaur v. Singh
101 A.D.3d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Drury v. Drury
90 A.D.3d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Harry v. Harry
85 A.D.3d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Holder v. Francis
67 A.D.3d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Gelardi v. Gelardi
62 A.D.3d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Kristine Z. v. Anthony C.
21 A.D.3d 1319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Hassett v. Hassett
4 A.D.3d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Charlene J.R. v. Walter A.M.
307 A.D.2d 1038 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re F.P. v. Sammie H.
305 A.D.2d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Flascher v. Flascher
298 A.D.2d 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 361, 688 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reilly-v-reilly-nyappdiv-1998.