Mawhirt v. Mawhirt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mawhirt v. Mawhirt

241 A.D.2d 524, 663 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7810

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 21, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 241 A.D.2d 524 (Mawhirt v. Mawhirt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mawhirt v. Mawhirt, 241 A.D.2d 524, 663 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Kingsley Mawhirt appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated July 30, 1996, which granted the petitioner an order of protection for a period of three years against him, and directed him to seek and complete psychiatric treatment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court’s finding that aggravating circumstances were present, justifying extending the order of protection for three years, is supported by the record (cf., Matter of Zirkind v Zirkind, 218 AD2d 745). Further, the Family Court was authorized to direct the appellant to seek and complete psychiatric treatment (see, Family Ct Act § 842 [i]). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Kingsley Mawhirt appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated July 30, 1996, which granted the petitioner an order of protection for a period of three years against him, and directed him to seek and complete psychiatric treatment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court’s finding that aggravating circumstances were present, justifying extending the order of protection for three years, is supported by the record (cf., Matter of Zirkind v Zirkind, 218 AD2d 745). Further, the Family Court was authorized to direct the appellant to seek and complete psychiatric treatment (see, Family Ct Act § 842 [i]). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D.2d 524, 663 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mawhirt-v-mawhirt-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack