Reid v. State

807 So. 2d 803, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2038, 2002 WL 269213
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reid v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 799 So. 2d 394
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 2002·No. No. 3D00-2969·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Norman Alexander Reid appeals his conviction for first degree murder and other offenses. Assuming for present purposes that defendant-appellant Reid was asked a cross-examination question which impermissibly revealed a prior bad act, the motion for mistrial was properly denied. The matter could reasonably have been addressed by a curative instruction, which the trial court offered. See Sullivan v. State, 303 So.2d 632, 635 (Fla.1974). More to the point, any possible harm to the defendant was dispelled by the defense cross-examination of the defendant’s girlfriend regarding the prior bad act.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reid v. State, 807 So. 2d 803, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2038, 2002 WL 269213 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

807 So. 2d 803 (Reid v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sullivan v. State
303 So. 2d 632 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)