Reid v. State

807 So. 2d 803, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2038, 2002 WL 269213
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 2002
DocketNo. 3D00-2969
StatusPublished

This text of 807 So. 2d 803 (Reid v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reid v. State, 807 So. 2d 803, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2038, 2002 WL 269213 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Norman Alexander Reid appeals his conviction for first degree murder and other offenses. Assuming for present purposes that defendant-appellant Reid was asked a cross-examination question which impermissibly revealed a prior bad act, the motion for mistrial was properly denied. The matter could reasonably have been addressed by a curative instruction, which the trial court offered. See Sullivan v. State, 303 So.2d 632, 635 (Fla.1974). More to the point, any possible harm to the defendant was dispelled by the defense cross-examination of the defendant’s girlfriend regarding the prior bad act.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sullivan v. State
303 So. 2d 632 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
807 So. 2d 803, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2038, 2002 WL 269213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reid-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.